|
I can’t remember giving much
thought to my career during the early years. All that seemed necessary was the
need to do well. The benchmark that guided me was the choice and quality of the
company car I got to drive. What ‘doing well’ meant didn’t seem to need
explaining at the time. With the magic of hindsight, I could have managed my
career better. Wherever you are in your sales career, perhaps you can benefit
from the helicopter view that I have acquired.
Ambition used to be defined by
what a person wanted to become. To be elevated to a senior position and given a
better title seemed desirable. Certainly the money was. Competition was fierce,
or so it seemed. The number of senior positions available is always limited and
the more promotions you achieve, the fewer places there are to be promoted into.
If this isn’t enough to put today’s ambitious person off, over the last several
decades, companies have being trying to take out layers of management and flatten
organisations to make them more competitive. Tom Peters, (www.tompeters.com)
has a lot to answer for!
Perhaps options other than
advancement were always available and I just didn’t think about them. Now I can
add a variety of things to the life plan - things I want to do, things I want to
experience, and things I want to accomplish. If you really want to push the
frontiers of personal development, add ‘who you want to become’. We are all
different, as many personality and motivation models reveal. The starting point,
if you want a starting point, is to understand yourself.
As I have latterly been
enlightened, my ambition has been largely driven by a need for freedom and
challenge rather than any desire for authority, power, or money. I learnt this
new way to describe my motivation from a trainer accreditation course run by
Novations. Embedded in the course I was learning to deliver, was Brooklyn Derr’s
Career Orientations model. It uses the labels, Advancement, Challenge, Security,
Balance, and Freedom to describe people’s needs at work. It seems that many sales
people are highly motivated by freedom and challenge. A field sales career is
certainly a good place to fulfil such desires.
Having the responsibility that
goes with a management position might be uncomfortable if you value freedom and
challenge above other motivators. Interestingly, over the course of my career, I
have heard and observed many sales people struggling to come to terms with their
first sales management position. I have known more than a few give up and go back
to a lone ranger role. I nearly counted myself amongst their ranks. It took two
years before I gave up the notion of giving up my ambition and ‘Manager’ status.
Experiencing a career plateau is
inevitable for everyone. This is a period when promotions or advancements stop.
It may not spell the doom portrayed in the classic ‘Peter Principle’ mini book by
Laurence J. Peter. The ‘Peter Principle’ states that everyone is eventually
promoted into a position that they are unable to carry out competently, and that
is where they stay. It is hard to discredit this idea unless you believe that
most people can continually grow in competence for ever. Laurence invented
another phrase, ‘the lateral abrasque. He used this phrase to describe how
organisations promote incompetent managers into lone ranger positions, where they
can’t do any harm. This is necessary to unblock the promotion ladder and allow
new, more competent people to take up the vacated positions.
There aren’t enough promotions
available to satisfy the demand. Promotion opportunities reduce as organisations
flatten so most people will experience position plateaus in their career. You
can’t have a lot of control over this outcome. On the other hand, there is no
need for people to experience contribution plateaus.
Organisations require people to
continually increase their contribution. Failure to maintain overall progress
begins a decline that competitors are quick to take advantage of. Paul Thompson
and Gene Dalton of Harvard carried out extensive research into career development
and produced the Four Stages™ model. It describes how people’s careers develop in
an organisation. This epic work demonstrates that even competent and independent
contributors cannot stand still. In my experience, sales targets regularly go up
and rarely if ever go down. Unless you can maintain your sales ability at the
peak of what’s possible, it is very hard to stand out as an individual
contributor.
Stage three of the Four Stages™
model shows that organisations need people who can multiply their contribution by
working through others. Perhaps surprisingly, the Four Stages™ research reveals
that having a management position is not necessary. People can work
interdependently to increase their effectiveness and contribution without a
manager’s role or title.
In this sales example, one
individual set aside her short term interests and invested in a multi country
sales opportunity. Most of the credit for the sale, and the compensation flowed
to the local country sales people. The time she invested compromised her ability
to achieve her own target, resulting in a 14% shortfall. The company won a major
global customer. Recognising this person’s contribution, the global head of sales
invited her to take up a global account management role.
These days pursuit of promotion
may not be the easiest way to increase contribution and be seen as a high
performer. While promotion opportunities are decreasing, leading organisations
are increasingly seeking to empower people. It is the organisations who can
create communities of effective stage three contributors who will outperform
their less competitive rivals.
Article by Clive Miller
Questions and comments to
clive@salessense.co.uk
|